Talk:Blue Ridge Quartet
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[Untitled]
[edit]This article should be deleted because it was copied word for word from another website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.139.255.215 (talk) 03:36, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Blue Ridge Quartet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111003195602/http://www.sgma.org:80/gogr_history/blue_ridge.htm to http://www.sgma.org/gogr_history/blue_ridge.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:18, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Don't Delete Just Yet
[edit]The Blue Ridge Quartet, as a group, easily meets and exceeds the standards set by notability guidelines for music groups on Wikipedia. However, the article does not convey that; rather it is merely a litany of member turnover in an ensemble that lasted 40 years, and the list of members below the article contains the exact same information. While I don't dispute that it was "copied from another website" the unsigned comment does not include the URL of the article that was copied, and I cannot find the original. The discography is a mess. The article as a whole needs a major overhaul, but it should be kept until a responsible editor can take it up.Pinikadia 12:33, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
- Start-Class Christian music articles
- Low-importance Christian music articles
- Start-Class Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christian music articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class South Carolina articles
- Low-importance South Carolina articles
- WikiProject South Carolina articles
- WikiProject United States articles