Talk:Blue Gum Forest
 | A fact from Blue Gum Forest appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 April 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Blue Gum Forest, Blue Mountains. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120318123103/http://www.sbw.org.au/SiteMedia/w3svc853/Uploads/Documents/HOW%20BLUE%20GUM%20FOREST%20WAS%20SAVED%20FROM%20THE%20AXE.pdf to http://www.sbw.org.au/SiteMedia/w3svc853/Uploads/Documents/HOW%20BLUE%20GUM%20FOREST%20WAS%20SAVED%20FROM%20THE%20AXE.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:55, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Edits of 18 December 2019
[edit]When I arrived to assess the article's importance, I noticed that it had several problems:
- Firstly, the article reads as being about a forest which is located in the protected area called the Blue Mountains National Park. However, it was described in several places in the article as being a separate protected area which is not supported by any reliable sources including an official webpage - please refer https://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/things-to-do/historic-buildings-places/blue-gum-forest . Content re a separate protected area has been removed.
- Secondly, the ICUN category used in the infobox is for the Blue Gum Hills Regional Park which is located near Newcastle, New South Wales while the Blue Gum Forest is located within the Blue Mountains National Park which is located to the west of Sydney and about 80 to 90 kilometres to the south-east of the Blue Gum Hills Regional Park. The 'protected areas' infobox has now been replaced with the more appropriate 'forest infobox'.
Regards