Talk:Blue Drop

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Organization of the plot section

Wouldn't it be clearer to combine the plot section into one large section and organize that in chronological order which would be:

Blue Drop: Tenshitachi no Gikyoku
Blue Drop: Maiorita Tenshi
Blue Drop: Tenshi no Bokura
Blue Drop: Tenshi no Itazura

(although I'm not sure where Blue Drop: Tenshi no Itazura goes since I haven't read it yet) and then have notes in the plot section that decribe which series that bit of plot comes from? AngelFire3423 (talk) 18:42, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, the most important is comprehension. Too many titles make it difficult to read, more so because we're always talking about the same universe and time line. Besides, having too many subsections is discouraged by style guidelines.

I also reverted what you did with the characters. Per guidelines, prose is always preferred over list format. Besides, there's no need to include more than the main characters. Remember that this "in universe" information (character description and plot) is not the most important to the article, so we have to keep it as brief as possible. The "out of universe" content, such as media coverage and reviews, is the most important (that's what gives a subject notability after all). A Reception section would be perfect then, but unfortunately there are no sources available yet.

Anyway, let's discuss here before doing any major change please.

EDIT: Now that I think about it, a separate list of characters might be a good idea. There we could include more characters than here. Kazu-kun (talk) 16:24, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Review(s)

Mania.com: Complete DVD collection

--KrebMarkt (talk) 20:18, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Blue Drop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:39, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]