Talk:Blue Denim

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Blue Denim article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Untitled

I don't think there is enough material to make a split here. If anyone wants to add more on the film, this article could stay as it is and a new film article could be created. The question in such cases is where does the comparison play/film go, which is also an argument for not splitting. I will add the film infobox here, but if there is much more on the film to be added, it can be moved there along with the templates of the talk page. Hoverfish Talk 16:48, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. The only major difference between the play and the movie is the altered ending (to match Hollywood standards of the time) and casting. I also wish that those who choose to label articles as "needing" or "lacking" something would simply add what they think is missing, instead of labelling. Zephyrad 23:34, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the split tag. My original intent was to go with the trend to create separate articles for Broadway plays and the films based on them if both were deemed to be significant works in their own right. Perhaps that doesn't apply in this case. Alan Smithee 05:06, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, since play and musical articles do not follow the same guidelines with film articles, it is good and wise at some point to split, so that each can develop in its own style. The only thing is that enough specific information has to gather before this can be achieved. As for Zephyrad's wish, it's often mine too, but please consider that an editor doing regular maintenance rounds may well be going through 30-60 articles per round, so these tags are the only practical way to react. Hoverfish Talk 08:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox photo

As soon as I can locate an appropriate poster of the film, I will relocate the soundtrack photo to that part of the article. trezjr (talk) 11:21, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clean-up

Clean-up on this article is pretty well complete. I would like to tweak the cast list to reflect the film's opening credits and maybe use a screenshot and some references, but it's pretty much there. trezjr (talk) 04:05, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blue Denim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711002345/http://filmscoremonthly.com/cds/detail.cfm?cdID=211 to http://filmscoremonthly.com/cds/detail.cfm?cdID=211

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:38, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]