Talk:Bloodshot (film)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bloodshot (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Talk
[edit]this film is still in production right,why it says its completed i mean there could be still some scenes to be shot,this seems like a marketing strategy because some footage suggests that shooting is still going on,the reference link to being completed might be about the last day of shooting in africa schedule,this is a big budget film too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.62.74.58 (talk) 11:35, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Plot writing or not writing?
[edit]I am thinking if it is good to right Plot sections for NEWLY released movies or not? Isn't this considered spoiling of those movies? Should we or Wikipedia stop this or not? Or may be we can at least add a spoiler alert before writing the plot just like in Reddit? And, I don't think the name of "Plot" being "Premise" will make everything well! Aminabzz (talk) 14:39, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- WP:FILMPLOT WP:SPOILER and WP:NOTCENSORED. Wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopedia, and there has long been the consensus that Plot section should include the plot when it is available, without any kind of spoiler warning, it is already in a section labelled "Plot" which is in effect a spoiler warning. -- 109.79.165.170 (talk) 12:04, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
PostTrak
[edit]PostTrak scores were added to article,[1] but at some point since then they were removed, and it is not at all clear why. I cannot be sure if this was deliberate or not.
Editors who actually read the article referenced might have been confused [2] because despite having already mentioned Posttrak in the article the writer does not explicitly repeat Posttrak when talking about it the "45% definite recommend" (which is the terminology used by PostTrak) and may have accidentally mistaken it for the Rotten Tomatoes Audience Score (which it completely different and if you check the RTAS is way higher at 78%[3]).
I'm fairly sure it was vandalism or a mistake, and the PostTrak score should probably be restored to the article. -- 109.79.166.89 (talk) 21:03, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- I went ahead and restored the scores.[4] -- 109.79.166.89 (talk) 21:10, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Poster with billing
[edit]Link: https://reviews.oliverkrauq.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Bloodshot-poster-2.jpg 187.10.149.176 (talk) 20:12, 3 December 2023 (UTC)