Jump to content

Talk:Blood on the Leaves/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lizzy150 (talk · contribs) 23:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Zmbro:

Just started a review of this. It looks great and hopefully can be promoted to GA status soon! My comments:

  • "The song has received" - do we need the word "has" in there?
  • Done
  • "but plans fell through" - this sounds informal/not encyclopaedic, perhaps "plans were abandoned"?
  • Yeah that's much better – fixed
  • "Since release" - "since its release"
  • Fixed
  • "inspired him to switch up his" - this also sounds slightly informal
  • I just removed that sentence. I haven't worked on this article in quite some time but reading it back, it just re-emphasizes the previous sentence so we'll just ditch it
  • "over rolling piano cords after which West's vocals begins." - "rolled piano chords"? (spelling error in chords)
  • That's embarrassing :-P – fixed
  • "After some time, the song unleashes" - could we be a bit specific, eg. after two minutes? Three minutes? Also, is 'unleash' the right term here as this feels informal?
  • It's at about the 1:06 mark so just "after one minute".
  • "contribute to the atmospheric production" - do we know what that means in particular?
  • I'll look into this a bit more.
  • "interpreted as a possible reference to the idea of Jay-Z being unfaithful.." - "speculated as a reference to Jay-Z being unfaithful.."? Personally I would use 'speculated'. But you could probably tweak that sentence so it's less wordy, eg. remove 'to the idea'.
  • Yeah that's much better – fixed
  • "but the idea fell through." - too informal as mentioned before
  • Changed to "plans were abandoned" and added a quote from Lynch where he mentioned not having "ideas"
  • Critical reception section - was there any negative or mixed feedback to the song?
  • I had a pretty hard time with this. Most reviews of Yeezus I found were of the album itself and didn't go track by track, but the ones that did (that I found) were universal in their praise for "Blood on the Leaves". It seems to me to be the most acclaimed song on the album. Do you think I should try to continue looking for a mixed/negative review?
  • "Upon the release of the album" - "Upon the album's release"? Try to reduce words.
  • Done
  • Source 45 to Official Charts - is this going to the right page to see the track position?
  • It wasn't. And according to the official page, this song never charted there, so I just removed it.

In summary, the article is mostly well-written. Appears to be stable and on-topic. I saw sufficient inline citations and sources, with archive links. No copyright violations were detected - there was one source that showed 47% violation likely but that site is quoting this Wikipedia article. Some appropriate media provided. Neutrality - this will pass. If there are any critical reviews/viewpoints, then they should be added. Hope this was useful, thanks Just Lizzy(talk) 23:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lizzy150 Thanks for grabbing this and for the review! Have a quick question about the reception, but other than that I believe I've fixed/responded to everything. Thanks again :-) – zmbro (talk) 02:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks great, thanks for addressing the points. If you can't find any other reviews, then it doesn't matter, but obviously will add to the balance. If you can expand/rephrase 'atmospheric production', then that will also be useful as it sounds a bit vague. Thanks, Just Lizzy(talk) 13:22, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lizzy150 Turns out both refs that were on that sentence said nothing about "atmospheric production" so I just ditched that sentence. Also combined background and composition since the comp section seemed a little small. – zmbro (talk) 16:32, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Zmbro:Just saw the Personnel section. Please rewrite it as per guidelines here. Just Lizzy(talk) 18:01, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lizzy150 Whoops was not aware of that. Fixed. – zmbro (talk) 21:31, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me now, thanks for your edits. Just Lizzy(talk) 15:11, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing! – zmbro (talk) 15:13, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Blood_on_the_Leaves/GA1&oldid=931969511"