Jump to content

Talk:BlooP and FlooP

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sufficient notability to remove the flag

[edit]

Sufficient notability

[edit]

Floop and Bloop are notable enough for me. In other words: I referenced this article, coming from Recursion. I'm going to remove the tag. It's still a stub, perhaps, but the links help etc etc. Bill Wvbailey (talk) 23:10, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops, it looks like a similar action on my part got delayed. Derek farn (talk) 00:40, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GlooP

[edit]

I think this page should probably talk about GlooP, given that GlooP is practically the entire reason these two languages were in the book, AFAICT.

Even though GlooP isn't very well-defined, some stuff could still be discussed about it.

Blitzer99 (talk) 05:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Agreed![reply]