Talk:Blockbusters (British game show)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Random IP address
[edit]Is it possible to put up semi-protection for this page to prevents edits from unregistered users (IP addresses), Especial now there Banned user doing it this way:
Liza Tarbuck version
[edit]The article implies that the (UK) Liza Tarbuck version was for adults. I'm fairly sure that it was only the Michael Aspel version that was for adults. In both versions the contestants had to be students, but the Aspel version allowed adult students, the Tarbuck version was restricted to sixth formers.
Can anyone confirm and, if agreed, update? 74.220.207.95 20:52, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Yes that is correct! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.205.118.65 (talk) 00:03, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
International info
[edit]This article relates to the UK show. Wouldn't it be most appropriate to put the international info in the US article, as the format originated there? Davidbod 22:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Important notice on Blockbusters repeatings on Challenge.
[edit]Please watch the series again. I have checked and it's the same 72 episodes from Series 10 that Challenge are showing. Basicallyleveled 19:55, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Transmissions : Original Series
[edit]Series 7: Did in fact start in January 1990 on all ITV station due to lack of space. A number of companies such as Central, TSW and Anglia, did broadcast repeats from Sept 89 To Dec 89. Here is a clip http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSDvWI38uCM TSW were getting the feed from Central.
Series 10: To Date, its always been said that ITV made 10 series of blockbusters with the last series having 180ep. Challenge NEVER admitted there only acquired one series: There only said 72 episodes, from the last series. But no links have appeared to say otherwise. Crazyseiko 15:15, 7 June 2012
= Was it 14 series afterall
[edit]This clip has turned up from the Sky one 1994 series: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5LT8uooN3Cs
It has XI which means 11. Does this mean ITN source has spilt up series 2 to create two series instead of one? or did central change their mind with the 1985 - 86 series and thought na, the last series was just one.
Blacklisted Links Found on Blockbusters (UK game show)
[edit]Cyberbot II has detected links on Blockbusters (UK game show) which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
- http://www.vegasslotsonline.com/fremantle/blockbusters/
- Triggered by
\bwww\.vegasslotsonline\.com\b
on the global blacklist
- Triggered by
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:24, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Blacklisted Links Found on Blockbusters (UK game show)
[edit]Cyberbot II has detected links on Blockbusters (UK game show) which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
- http://www.vegasslotsonline.com/fremantle/blockbusters/
- Triggered by
\bwww\.vegasslotsonline\.com\b
on the global blacklist
- Triggered by
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:20, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Blockbusters (UK game show). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080509135159/http://www.toyretailersassociation.co.uk/toty/80.htm to http://www.toyretailersassociation.co.uk/toty/80.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:29, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Rage Music
[edit]I removed the link to Rage Music's website because I was under the impression that promotional links (where the subject doesn't have/ merit their own Wikipedia article) weren't allowed. User:Crazyseiko reverted the change in good faith, but didn't elaborate on why they thought a promo link was acceptable, instead defining what a promo link is.
I was going by these two reasons:
- WP:ELNO – specifically, "Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a featured article" and "Individual web pages that primarily exist to sell products or services"
- Paul Boross' MB Music Productions website isn't included next to his music credit.
I'm very happy to be corrected, though. 86.186.108.184 (talk) 00:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Transmissions
[edit]This is getting bad now, it become a never ending change between users and there clearly has been a lack of any communication to highlight what the actually problems are, can we have a proper discussion about this. The big problem is S10 ref keeps on being taken out yet NONE of the other refs which are from the same source have been changed. How can this be resolved? --Crazyseiko (talk) 14:55, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
@RobinCarmody, 86.176.69.47, and 86.171.159.79: Message text. Can users please talk about this before making further changes?
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Blockbusters (UK game show). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921161626/http://www.challenge.co.uk/simon-mayo-to-host-new-series-of-blockbusters-for-challenge-tv-1.html to http://www.challenge.co.uk/simon-mayo-to-host-new-series-of-blockbusters-for-challenge-tv-1.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090827191518/http://archive.gulfnews.com/articles/09/08/21/10342097.html to http://archive.gulfnews.com/articles/09/08/21/10342097.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:38, 21 July 2017 (UTC)