Talk:Blistering (magazine)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 17 November 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Blistering to Blistering (magazine). The result of the discussion was moved. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Blistering. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051105062827/http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com:80/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=41882 to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=41882
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 17 November 2022
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Per RM discussion. See talk page. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 00:58, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Blistering → Blistering (magazine) – Searches and page views suggest that the magazine is not a primary topic, so "Blistering" should redirect to Blister (disambiguation). Certes (talk) 21:38, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support per views[[1]]. This is probably an unlikely search term but it does seem like the generic meaning have more long-term significance. Indeed Google doesn't appear to return anything for the magazine. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:44, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- Also, Blister has 200 times more page views than Blistering. Of course, most views for Blister are not from readers looking for "blistering", but it seems likely that more than 0.5% of them are. Certes (talk) 21:55, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nomination and Crouch, Swale. The magazine is indeed not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for this common adjective / adverb. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 08:33, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- support generic term is primary topic—blindlynx 21:57, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support generic term is primary topic if any, WP:NOPRIMARY, so redirect to dab In ictu oculi (talk) 22:00, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:38, 24 November 2022 (UTC)