Talk:Blinkist

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nothing new under the sun

Can you say: “Reader’s Digest?”12.89.124.50 (talk) 18:30, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Logo

Please do not revert the logo to the raster version. Wikipedia policy dictates that an SVG version of higher quality is more preferred than the raster versions. 203.189.119.117 (talk) 09:09, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please link to this policy. 331dot (talk) 09:10, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Logos of higher quality are preferred as part of existing convention, as stated in PD-textlogo template 223.25.62.214 (talk) 14:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is also stipulated in Wikipedia:Logos that "reasonable diligence should be taken to ensure that the logo is accurate and has a high-quality appearance" 223.25.62.214 (talk) 14:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see in the policy where it says a specific format is preferred, nor what is wrong with the logo as it was. You need to stop edit warring and discuss this. 331dot (talk) 14:49, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to reiterate that Wikipedia:Logos clearly states logos must be ensured to be of high quality appearance, therefore implying that SVG formats which are far more superior than raster versions (PNG, JPG, etc) are highly preferred. Thus I am restoring the current SVG version logo. There's someone who keeps on reverting the logo to a sub-par quality version, which is a destructive and vandalizing behavior in my opinion 203.189.119.122 (talk) 02:48, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Someone was me- and your definition of vandalism is in error. Please see WP:VAND: "On Wikipedia, vandalism has a very specific meaning: editing (or other behavior) deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose," and "Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism."

I don't see any difference at all between the quality of the logos. Per WP:BRD I request that you self-revert until you obtain a consensus for your change and adequately explain the difference between the logos. 331dot (talk) 07:43, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]