Talk:Blindsight (Watts novel)

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Novels: Sci-fi Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Science fiction task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Unreferenced articles

This article was provided with references by an Unreferenced articles project volunteer on 2008-10-03. If you edit this page, please build on the good work by citing your sources.Unreferenced articlesWikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articlesTemplate:WikiProject Unreferenced articlesUnreferenced articles articles

Appallingly Bad Article

This article is positively rife with conjecture about the novel, treating various critic's guesses and interpretations as fact. Two quick examples:

"Within the novel, humans no longer engage in sex with other humans for pleasure, instead choosing to use virtual reality to find idealized and submissive partners" ...the birth rate has certainly plummeted in this fictional future, but many humans/transhumans still enjoy physical sex.

If I recall, during Siri's flashbacks with Chelsea he mentions that she, atypically, preferred real physical sex, and that she was annoyed/hurt that he created a virtual sim of her to have virtual sex with. Cloudswrest (talk) 00:21, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"...a plot element near the climax of the story, in which the vampire captain is revealed to have been controlled by the ship's artifical [sic] intelligence for the entirety of the novel." No, not really. The AI apparently always had the capacity to control / override the captain's body, but any control it may have exercised before the novel's climax is purely conjectural.

I don't want to go on and on about this all day, but wow... citations supporting some of these statements simply refer to articles where various critics are *guessing* about the book's themes, at it's treated as fact. Sloppy, sloppy stuff. Reducing the article to a stub would at least be less misleading than leaving it in its current state,

24.240.73.170 (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Three Linguistic Ambiguities

Is there a citation for the source of the sentence about the linguistic ambiguities? I personally think the three are "lie", "annoying", and that the "cousins" are nieces/nephews or neanderthals - cousins in the familial sense vs. a "cousin" branch of humanity.

87.81.224.218 (talk) 22:33, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, this article sucks

Any thoughts on mentioning any characters in the story? I've seen more information about something listed on the side of a box of cereal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.185.85.58 (talk) 05:05, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We from Wikipedia have to make sure that articles about genre fiction are as dissuasive and uninformative as possible to discourage people from calling them up.

We must guarantee that those sci-fi bastards are put into their place. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.250.182.229 (talk) 02:24, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Distribution

The book itself can be readily downloaded from the Authors website under The Creative Commons Licence. It is one of the few books that has been released this way - should this not be mentioned somewhere? User:Harbutt —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.71.50.108 (talk) 14:14, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summary: non-sentient humans?

Last paragraph of summary goes: "which he eventually realizes is being overrun by a non-sentient offshoot of humanity, beginning to exterminate what may be the only spark of consciousness in the universe". Is that directly supported by book's plot or just a conjecture? I'm very curious about this, because I had a trouble getting through some of quite info-dense Watts' prose, so it's entirely possible I missed that part, but I can't really recall that all being said overtly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.5.195.146 (talk) 22:45, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Blindsight (Watts novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nippon2007.us/hugo_press_release.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mmcgrath.co.uk/?p=1246
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.shaviro.com/Blog/?p=522
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141015230436/http://www.sciencefictionfirst.com/transcript-podcast-2-blindsight-by-peter-watts/ to http://www.sciencefictionfirst.com/transcript-podcast-2-blindsight-by-peter-watts/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://lareviewofbooks.org/review/ferociously-intellectual-pulp-writing
Corrected formatting/usage for http://cognitivephilosophy.net/book-reviews/book-review-blindsight-by-peter-watts/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:40, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]