Talk:Blattabacterium

This page certainly doesn't meet the criteria for patent nonsense. It is underdeveloped, but represents a genuine family of bacteria. My source is Bergey's Manual, 2001. I just don't feel like I've said anything that merits citation. The article deserves to stay so that it can be developed. Ninjatacoshell 23:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The best thing to do is find some content to go with the (currently) single-sentence article, and cite that. Regards, — BillC^talk 23:57, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

csd

Is that the only book that the term appears in?--eskimospy ^(talk) 23:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are eight PubMed papers about the Genus it contains, Blattabacterium:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Search&db=pubmed&term=blattabacterium&tool=fuzzy&ot=blattobacterium And, Bergey's is the reference manual for bacteriology. Just about any page dealing with bacteria will cite Bergey's manual. It is a definitive source. Ninjatacoshell 00:02, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sorry about that. I will remove the CSD tag.--eskimospy ^(talk) 00:12, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I can see how the name can put you off. Ninjatacoshell 00:32, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Microbial Symbiosis and Microbiomes

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 13 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Micbrobialmania (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Micbrobialmania (talk) 20:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]