Talk:Black pudding (Dungeons & Dragons)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Black pudding (Dungeons & Dragons) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
In-universe
[edit]I am trying to make this article avoid in universe style, I will then move on to trying to raise its quality in general. I am very new to the D&D project and wiki editing in general so I am picking an article of low importance so as to have a safe place to develop my ability to improve articles in this project. Ancientchild (talk) 17:23, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 17:25, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Primary Sources
[edit]I've never used the Talk function before, so I have no idea how to format this sort of thing. So forgive me if this is done/parsed incorrectly, or the syntax is wrong. But, since there's no interpretation, isn't it fine that it uses primarily primary sources? As long as there's no interpretation, they're superior to, or at least equivalent to, secondary sources. It's a fact-based article as there's no room for interpretation, correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.65.123.167 (talk) 09:04, 6 June 2014 (UTC)