Talk:Black Tears

Black Tears has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Black Tears is part of the Dream Days at the Hotel Existence series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 12, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
February 13, 2008	Featured topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Australia: Music Low‑importance

	Australia portal Black Tears is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Powderfinger (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Powderfinger, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.PowderfingerWikipedia:WikiProject PowderfingerTemplate:WikiProject PowderfingerPowderfinger articles

Class

Non-single songs are not mentioned on the Powderfinger WikiProject page, but I've allocated this song a mid-importance tag as its importance is equal to any single at present due to its controversy. --linca ^linca 11:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the controversy will last, so I changed it to low. And I added the category to the importance scale on WP:FING. ~ G1ggy! _{Reply | Powderfinger!} 04:46, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I guess you're right. If the song ended up being strung out and actually affecting the release date, then I see the legitimacy in keeping it as mid, but you're right. Since it's not now actually affecting tghe album's release, it doesn't matter now. --linca ^linca 09:35, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If it does suddenly affect the release date, then it will change importance, obviously. ~ G1ggy! _{Reply | Powderfinger!} 09:41, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The lyrics fade out?

The version of the song released on the album fades out while the bridge lyrics enter, presumably lyrics not heard are the lyrics that are considered to be inappropriate. (From the article)

I'm 100% sure my version of Black Tears (which came with DDatHe Bonus DVD version, bought on June 4) contains the lyrics "An island watch-house bed, a black man’s lying dead" - aren't they the lyrics that were supposedly faded out? - G 1 ggy ^Talk/_Contribs 03:12, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My understanding was that that was part of it (as that was what was in the papers). I believe that there was something that was able to be taken more directly and literally about the case that made it need to be removed. I'm not 100% sure, though. I'll double check my version, because it faded out early. Is your version 2:30 long? Maybe you've got a different version, because of the DVD release? Maybe it was even faultily kept (or sneakily and intentionally). --linca ^linca 04:04, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mine is 2:30 long, but it doesn't sound as if there would be a different length. I'm guessing there would just be a longer faded period (the faded period in mine is very short), but I don't know...odd. I'm assuming yours is the iTunes version, right? - G 1 ggy ^Talk/_Contribs 05:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Palm Island

This article is incorrect: Bernard Fanning did say that the song had parts on the Palm Island case http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/05/04/1914873.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.190.41.78 (talk) 02:34, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA nom on hold

Okay, I don't know if I suck at reviewing, or if you just friggen rule, but... The only thing I noticed is that maby you should get an edition number or date of release for ref 9. That is all I see. ;D Burningclean _{[Speak the truth!]} 22:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the praise (it's more H2O who deserves it). As to the request you've made, it's

Done. I've amended that and expanded the reference. I can't find the original publication number, but I found the direct official web resource (which is almost better). --rm 'w a vu 02:45, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1... 2... passed! Burningclean _{[Speak the truth!]} 02:53, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Skeeker/Burning Clean! :-) --rm 'w a vu 03:25, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks indeed. Dihydrogen Monoxide 04:26, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edge Of Sanity

There is also song called Black Tears from the metal band Edge Of Sanity, which was also covered by Heaven Shall Burn. --85.127.230.175 (talk) 16:00, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Was it released as a single, or was it otherwise notable (per WP:MUSIC)? dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 00:47, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edge of Sanity is on the Edge of Notability as it is, as is Heaven Shall Burn, so I don't think we've got much of an issue here. --rm 'w a vu 06:03, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Black Tears. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080511203307/http://pariahnt.org/news/content/view/32/1/ to http://www.pariahnt.org/news/content/view/32/1/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:19, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Black Tears. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:01, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]