Talk:Black Sabbath (film)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: The lad searches the night for his newts (talk · contribs) 02:24, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
I have a couple of questions about the article. Can you add citations to the lead and infobox, and remove the redlinks to articles that have not been created? --The lad searches the night for his newts (talk) 02:24, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hello, I could add citations to the lead, but can you specify where? Most, if not all the information is cited for the article. Ditto for the infobox. I've added cites previously to the infobox where there was no mention of the person and their role in the film. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:59, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
- (stalking) Per WP:LEADCITE, citations in the lead are a matter of taste, but generally not required as the information is already verifiable in the body. For example, Dartford Crossing has a single citation in the lead to bolster an aggregate claim presented later in the main part of the article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:38, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, @Ritchie333:. So if @The lad searches the night for his newts: can elaborate on what might need a source or otherwise continue the review, then we'd be cooking. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:45, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- (stalking) Per WP:LEADCITE, citations in the lead are a matter of taste, but generally not required as the information is already verifiable in the body. For example, Dartford Crossing has a single citation in the lead to bolster an aggregate claim presented later in the main part of the article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:38, 16 October 2014 (UTC)