Talk:Black Forest Fire

Wildfire Low‑importance

	Black Forest Fire is part of WikiProject Wildfire, which collaborates on wildfire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.WildfireWikipedia:WikiProject WildfireTemplate:WikiProject WildfireWildfire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Colorado Start‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

Evacuation areas screen captures

What does everyone think about including screen captures of the evacuation areas for the article (such as here and here)? I think they would really add a lot to the article and would be great for historical purposes. I'm just not sure of the copyright/permissions aspect of them. Anyone else? — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 15:46, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A screen capture is a rather clear copyright violation. --Footwarrior (talk) 13:33, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not so certain about that. The Google Maps article itself has several. For any fires--not just this one--it might really be fair use. I'd like to see the policy. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 14:54, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Black Forest Wildfire

Two articles on the same fire, the other is a stub. Footwarrior (talk) 13:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support. No need for two articles on the exact same event. Merge any usable content and turn the Wildfire one into a redirect. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 14:50, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done I'd support, but the merge seems to have already been done. Wilhelm Meis (☎ Diskuss | ✍ Beiträge) 16:10, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anon unsourced addition

An anonymous user added this to the article in the lead:

actually there was no fire anywhere near this location, the fire started several miles east of there, this is the location that the fire was incorrectly reported as having started on the day of the fire, which created a great deal of unnecessary confusion and danger to Black forest residents

While that may or may not be true, there was no ref provided and--to be honest--it was an awkward edit. If anyone wants to find a ref and add it back, feel free. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 00:28, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Black Forest Fire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130618143013/http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_23451177/black-forest-fire-evacuation-zone-expands-winds-lightning to http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_23451177/black-forest-fire-evacuation-zone-expands-winds-lightning

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:14, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Black Forest Fire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130717133246/http://www.epcsheriff.com/bff/Black%20Forest%20Fire%20-%20Residences.pdf to http://www.epcsheriff.com/bff/Black%20Forest%20Fire%20-%20Residences.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:10, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]