Talk:Black Creek, Wisconsin

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Copyright and licensing

If the Village of Black Creek history page is an original work, then anything taken from it and placed in this article is a copyright violation and will be removed. If the Village of Black Creek history page is a copy of an older version of the Wikipedia Black Creek article, then it violates Wikipedia's Creative Commons licensing, which clearly states that material taken from WP must at a minimum include the URL of the WP article and refer to the WP Creative Commons license. I'm assuming that the Village of Black Creek site copied the WP article. Therefore, it is circular to use the Village of Black Creek page as a source for the WP article, and any references to the Village of Black Creek history page will be removed. 75.13.69.72 (talk) 19:32, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tone and format

What concerns are there on this article and where are they located? If you know where they are please fix them or list them on this talk page. I am from Black Creek and I'm trying to make this article complete, to the point, and trustworthy. User 75.13.69.72 (talk) please don't leave me hanging if there are things wrong. The article will get done faster if we work together. If there are no concerns please remove the template. 1014cd (talk) 21:34, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's much better than it was. Some of the history section is still a bit too informal. I'm not sure that all of the Recreation and tourism section is encyclopedic (e.g., spaghetti dinners and ice cream socials). All of the external links should be removed from the article, and the references formatted. I've already done a couple of citations as examples. Perhaps you could do the remainder. The number of external links should also be reduced. Check the WikiProject Cities guidelines for help. 75.13.69.72 (talk) 22:28, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Black Creek, Wisconsin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:36, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]