Talk:Black Belt (region of Alabama)

Merging two articles on the Alabama Black Belt

The articles Alabama Black Belt and Black Belt (region of Alabama) cover an identical topic and should be merged. I suggest Alabama Black belt is the less developed of the two and should be replaced with a redirect once the merge is complete.--Chris Jefferies 22:53, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Alabama Black Belt was only created on May 2, 2007. It seems to be about both the black belt described on this page as well as Black Belt (U.S. region). Both of these articles are older and more in-depth. Both could use work to be sure, but having a third article is not helpful. I could see three articles if one was on the large racially-based region, one was on the economic/political region of Alabama, and one was specially on the geologic soil-based (physiographic) region that includes parts of Mississippi as well as Alabama. If someone wanted to tackle such a thing that would be wonderful. I'm not up to the task at the moment. Otherwise, yea, if there is anything useful and new on Alabama Black Belt, it ought to be moved to one of the two existing pages, I think. Pfly 01:10, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also have too many other things going on right now to put a lot of effort into this merge. Here's a suggestion for anyone who wants to tackle the job - how about merging Alabama Black Belt into Black Belt (region of Alabama) first, and once that's complete think afresh about the possibility of a further merge with Black Belt (U.S. region)? This would be much more manageable than trying to merge all three in one step.

I'll leave the articles alone for a while, at least until there seems to be no more discussion, and then I might do the basic merge and set up the redirect etc, but I'll probably have to leave the editing in of the merged text to others.--Chris Jefferies 08:50, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've completed the basic merge and set up the redirect. I don't have time right now to edit the new material into the article properly, it's just appended. The merged material included a couple of notices which I've left. It may be OK to remove this once the combined document is completed.--Chris Jefferies 16:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Black Belt (region of Alabama). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:48, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Black Belt (region of Alabama). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://factfinder2.census.gov/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080820143944/http://www.census.gov/popest/counties/tables/CO-EST2007-01-01.csv to http://www.census.gov/popest/counties/tables/CO-EST2007-01-01.csv
Corrected formatting/usage for http://blackbeltfound.ua.edu/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question on “Counties” section

I’m just wondering who considers Lamar County part of the Black Belt. I don’t see a citation for it. The article concedes that Lamar doesn’t fit geographically. It doesn’t fit demographically, either. It’s “rural,” but so are a lot of places.

No one would call Bibb County part of the Black Belt, even though it’s also rural and borders Black Belt counties. Sartysnopes (talk) 06:16, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]