Talk:Black-backed forktail
Appearance
Black-backed forktail has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 24, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Black-backed forktail appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 October 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Black-backed forktail/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 09:57, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Garhwal and Tenasserim link to disambiguation pages.
- I'd link 'coverts' to Covert feather, assuming that's what you're referring to.
- "and the inner primaries have white tips and the base of the secondaries are covered in a small white patch" - two uses of "and the" makes this read awkwardly
- "least concern" is in lower case in the lead though is stylised "Least Concern" in the final paragraph.
This article continues the comprehensive and well-written style I've come to expect from you. Well done. Looking forward to passing this when very minor issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 09:57, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Freikorp: Many thanks. I've addressed your points, and will try to get to your FAC shortly. Vanamonde (talk) 11:33, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Passing. :) Freikorp (talk) 11:36, 24 October 2017 (UTC)