Talk:Björk/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 17:32, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   There are too many short paragraphs consisting of only a sentence or two. Many sections lack direction and focus.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   There are many deadlinks that may have fallen prey to WP:linkrot

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   There are many, many sentences that need citations. Some are marked, but I feel like I'm spending too much time locating them when some of the content may not even be worth keeping.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   It might be too broad

   B. Focused:

   There are too many unnecessary details here, which really bog the article down and somewhat obscure her more notable accomplishments

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   I think there may be too many details coming from a fan's viewpoint.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Sorry, but this article still needs a lot of work to get to GA. --Tea with toast (話) 19:09, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Gah - oh well. Although I believe you forgot to fail the article. What a pro. (talk) 13:48, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.