Talk:Bitter Lawyer

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging articles

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Nycbl1y (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection.

2010 comments

This page was previously deleted for lack of notability. The deleting administrator is aware I am recreating it. I believe the article on Forbes, Webby award, and award from the American Bar Association Journal (a leading legal industry publication) should be sufficient to establish notability.

I am disclosing a conflict of interest, since I have written for the site.Nycbl1y (talk) 03:17, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Just made some small updates. Full disclosure: I edit Lawyerist.com, which now owns Bitter Lawyer. My edits are minor, but I would like to provide a more-complete update to the article in the future. Sam Glover (talk) 04:53, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:COI in full. Though you should feel free to delete errors of fact, you should not make additions to the article. Instead, request such edits here in Talk. Other editors will usually promptly help. As it stands, your edits are now subject to deletion solely based on COI. --Lexein (talk) 10:04, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. If the edits I made are removed, I suggest they be un-removed, because they are purely factual, which can be verified simply by visiting BitterLawyer.com. I did not add anything substantial other than the sale of Bitter Lawyer to Lawyerist, for which I added a citation, but this article could use quite a lot of updating. Sam Glover (talk) 05:31, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken a quick look at the edits. They look hunky-dory to me. – S. Rich (talk) 05:38, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

FYI, I am no longer connected to Bitter Lawyer in any way. Lawyerist Media, LLC, sold the site and all related assets to Bitter Empire, LLC, in May 2014. Sam Glover (talk) 21:20, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bitter Lawyer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]