Talk:Bitnami

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 August 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by SamJohnston (talk · contribs) on 23 February 2010 with the comment:
does anyone still care about this article? questionable notability
It was contested by Cnilep (talk · contribs) on 2010-02-24 with the comment:
Notability is not temporary; sources in "further reading" suggest notability.

Open source project?

Reading on bitnami.com there is no mention of how to obtain the source code, and the source code also does not seem to be in their github account. So I made this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bitnami&type=revision&diff=660636537&oldid=646518261

There are two confusing indications though, one is the statement "Yes, Bitnami is open source" (but also without a mention of where to get the source code) on https://bitnami.com/forums/forums/general/topics/is-bitnami-open-source and the other is the mention of "pursuant to the Apache License version 2.0" on https://bitnami.com/azure/terms.

If anybody knows where to obtain the source code of Bitnami's product (either the library of packages, or the BitRock's InstallBuilder tool with which to build such packages), then please accept my apologies, undo my commit accordingly, and add a reference to the location where the source code can be downloaded (and then change the License attribute at the top to whatever license is included in that download). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michielbdejong (talk • contribs) 19:40, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 10th, Thanks for reaching out Michiel. I'm Daniel Lopez, founder of Bitnami. The stacks are open source under the Apache 2.0 license. We do not modify or patch any of the underlying components so you can download the source code from the original projects. That is actually one of our goals, we have no intention to fork or make proprietary changes to the software we package, just to make it easier to install. You can find the licenses for all the open source components that we package under the licenses/ directory in the installation directory.

We do not provide the source code to InstallBuilder as that is not part of the stack itself.

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-faq.html#GPLCompatInstaller

Hope this clarifies the licensing issue — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.176.149.23 (talk) 21:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bitnami. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090228123128/http://enanocms.org:80/News:1233752530 to http://enanocms.org/News:1233752530

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:30, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]