Talk:Bitcoin Magazine
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bitcoin Magazine article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 16 September 2017. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Wikipedia rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bitcoin Magazine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160502115906/https://bitcoinmagazine.com/ to http://www.bitcoinmagazine.com/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160502115906/https://bitcoinmagazine.com/ to http://www.bitcoinmagazine.com
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]@Jytdog: here is the original content with sources relating to the print version.
In 2012, Bitcoin Magazine began publishing a print edition and has been referred to as the first serious publication dedicated to cryptocurrencies.[1] The magazine was mailed to subscribers worldwide, sold at Barnes & Noble, bookstores and published online.[2] Bitcoin magazine was the first magazine dedicated to crypto currency.[2] The magazine was available in 2012 for $9 per month, although many of its articles were also available online for free.[3] Buterin noted he spent 10-20 hours per week writing for the publication.[4]
References
- ^ Vigna, Paul; Casey, Michael J. "Community". The Age of Cryptocurrency: How Bitcoin and the Blockchain Are Challenging ... Macmillan Publishers. p. 88. ISBN 9781250065636.
- ^ a b "BTC Media Acquires Bitcoin Magazine". Bitcoin Magazine. Coin Publishing Ltd. Retrieved 3 May 2016.
- ^ Nair, Malavika (11 November 2013). "Radical entrepreneurship in Bitcoin makes it the exemplar". FEE. Retrieved 22 September 2017.
- ^ Tapscott, Don (13 March 2017). "The Blockchain Revolution and Higher Education". EducaseReview. Retrieved 22 September 2017.
Which part should we keep? Looks like a lot of non-neutral stripping of some high quality (google books) sources here [1] by Smallbones (talk · contribs) Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 05:34, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- 1. Where is the material referred to? I certainly can't find it.
- 2. Self-reference from an amateur mag.
- 3. The article is titled "Free Money for Everyone", a real chatty piece with a mention in passing from the Libertarian "Foundation for Economic Education" ending "It’s a small price to pay to circumvent central banking. Are we up for it?" If you put crap like that in as a reference, nobody is going to take you seriously.
- 4. I don't know EducaseReview but that article is super promotional. Blockchain is going to revolutionize education - what a joke!
Smallbones(smalltalk) 08:32, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- This response is nonsense. I have re-added the content. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 17:32, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Using the magazine as a reliable source
[edit]Discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ethereum#Can_we_use_Bitcoin_Magazine_as_a_reliable_source? (delta) — Charles Stewart (talk) 08:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Abandoned user draft
[edit]Please would an interested editor assess whether the earlier 2014 draft at User:Urbenz/sandbox contains any material that is valid and still useful. If so, please incorporate it and leave a note here. – Fayenatic London 12:31, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Problem is that it lacks sources. I recall a few years ago this article had more sources, but we later clamped down on the industry sources, and thus there is much less to work with today. I suppose the statement "If you don’t know me (Mihai Alisie), I have been involved with Bitcoin Magazine since its original..." is interesting and encyclopedic, do you have a source for this? Jtbobwaysf (talk) 15:40, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Notability?
[edit]I notice that the extensive list of sources is ... tangential at best. What three sources most clearly illustrate that Bitcoin Magazine is notable in its own right? - David Gerard (talk) 12:37, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
- I think most of the notability stems from Vitalik Buterin's association with it as former writer, or editor, what whatever he did. It is the first Bitcoin print publication and is notable in that respect. Publications are often notable for what they cover, not themself. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 20:46, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Junk sourcing
[edit]Hi, I removed a long of junk sourced content. We are not using bitcoin magazine as a source on its own article, that would be WP:PROMO among other problems. Please note that we are not using cryptocurrency news site sources, such as this one, coindesk, the block, etc on these cryptocurrency articles. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 08:12, 29 August 2023 (UTC)