Talk:Bishops in the Catholic Church

Catholicism Top‑importance

Bishops in the Catholic Church is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Licit vs. Valid

> In the Catholic Church a bishop can validly ordain a priest as a bishop provided that permission of the Holy See has been granted. <

I heard this is actually false. The priest will visit Rome where the Pope himself in person will ordain him into a bishop. If this is not possible (due to distant travel or hostile political situation in the priest's land), the Pope can grant permission to THREE bishops to ordain the priest into a bishop but all three have to be present at the event to be valid.

The permission of the Holy See is for licet celebration, not validity. Also, for licit celebration, 3 bishops are required. For validity, only one bishop is required. It is neither required for validity or licity that the pope be present.DaveTroy 09:14, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

your mileage may vary depending on rite. This is something of a moving target as Orientalium Ecclesiarum is implemented over time by the various rites. The current state of affairs in the Ruthenian Church is not the same as the Ukrainian. TMLutas 18:06, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern/Western pic

I'd suggest a picture of an eastern bishop be added to the page in order to show the diversity of appearance. The dominance of the latin rite often leads some to think that latin habits are normative. Nothing wrong with the latin forms and the article is pretty well balanced in word. Visually, it's more latin centered. TMLutas 18:04, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, feel free to add an appropriate photo. Majoreditor 03:24, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology Question

How is the word Bishop in english derived from the greek Episkopos? I mean is Bishop a word that was arround when they traslated from greek (then an additional explanation for the etymology might be needed) or is it actually a derivation from Episkopos? Many thanks, Pablo2garcia (talk) 23:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Major Re-write

I'm going to undertake a major rewrite of this article. Most of the content is copied verbatim from bishop, and that's hardly necessary. This page should focus on the functions of bishops within the Catholic Church. Here are some potential sections for the article:

Hisorical overview - of the office of Bishop (based primarily on the Catholic Encyclopedia, but edited into a short section)
Roles of Bishops - canonical and sacramental responsibilities. brief discussion of diocesean vs. curial functions.
Appointment process
Episcopal ordination
Pontifical dress

I'm thinking we should just focus on the Latin Rite of the Roman Catholic Church. Trying to add all the particulars for all the sui juris churches just seems to be far too broad. I'm going to start making some edits today to removed duplicated content. If anybody has any questions or suggestions, please put them here. Dgf32 (talk) 22:32, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The project is now underway. I've removed the material copied verbatim from bishop. Dgf32 (talk) 21:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Ordination rifan.jpg

The image File:Ordination rifan.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:49, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bishop-priest relationship

Much has been said regarding the bishop-priest relationship, that is to say the interactions between a senior pastor and his clergymen. This probably deserves to be included somewhere in this entry. [1][2][3] ADM (talk) 05:33, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How, and How Much, are Bishops Paid?

It would be instructive to know who pays bishops, priests, etc. and how much they get and who decides on raises and where the money comes from. And what about other remuneration such as free housing? NStahl (talk) 01:46, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pectoral cross outside of chasuble

The image of a bishop on this page has a caption that reads: "A Latin-Rite Catholic bishop wearing the pontifical vestments and carrying a crosier, though the pectoral cross should be beneath the chasuble and stole, not over them." While the Ceremonial of Bishops does in fact state that the pectoral cross should be underneath the chasuble (61), the CDW did actually permit the pectoral cross to be worn over the chasuble in order for the bishop to be differentiated from other concelebrants (Notitiae). So I'm removing the mention in the caption. — AJDS ^talk 17:13, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bishop (Catholic Church). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bishop in the Catholic Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:11, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Missing types of bishops

Two forms of bishops that should be mentioned in this article are non-metropolitan archbishops (by virtue of holding a non-metropolitan archiepiscopal see) and archbishops ad personam. When I get a chance, I will try to add these. Ergo Sum 16:53, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not a complete sentence!

I find

Bishop-prelate A bishop who is consecrated as such, but holds an office that as such does not require episcopal rank (so the incumbent will not be made a titular bishop), just that of Prelate, notably as Territorial prelate.

This is not a complete sentence, although I am not quite sure what the complete sentence should be. Carlm0404 (talk) 17:53, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 May 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) b uidhe 03:56, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bishop in the Catholic Church → Bishops in the Catholic Church – Per WP:PLURAL Elizium23 (talk) 01:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Srnec (talk) 02:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Rreagan007 (talk) 16:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Sharper {talk} 19:39, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Could I ask for what specific part of the policy would call for a plural here? All other articles about all other hierarchs are singular, from patriarch to grand master to provincial superior to Minister General, not to mention Bishop (Methodism) and Bishop in the Eastern Orthodox Church. -- choster (talk) 15:13, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. +1 nom. Also many types of bishops.--Hippeus (talk) 13:03, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose This article is not about bishops, the individual people, but about the concept and duties of a bishop, and exactly what point of WP:PLURAL would suggest that this article should be pluralized is not clear. Essentially all articles about offices and positions are singular, from grand vizier to poet laureate to Kentucky Colonel. If the desire is to simplify, parenthetical disambiguation as Bishop (Catholic Church) would be preferable, compare High Court judge (England and Wales) or Governor (United States). -- choster (talk) 13:55, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Better title than the current. But would prefer Bishop (Catholic Church), since we generally prefer the singular. -- Necrothesp (talk) 22:46, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - groups of people have always been an exception written into WP:PLURAL Red Slash 17:19, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Peoples, ethnic groups, etc, yes, but not positions. We don't have articles titled Generals or Priests or Bakers. Parenthetical disambiguation is the norm for these if necessary. See Category:Episcopacy in the Catholic Church. Which other position is in the plural? -- Necrothesp (talk) 21:48, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.