Talk:Bishop of St Asaph
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Clicking on the name "William Beveridge" brings you a page not about the BISHOP Beveridge but about an altogether different, and much later, William Beveridge.
Redundancy
[edit]This page and Diocese_of_St_Asaph contain much of the same content. Suggestions? TSP 02:55, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- I would suggest that in all such instances both a Diocese and a Bishop article are valid (i.e. they should not be merged). The Diocese article should contain information specific to the history and geography etc. of the diocese whilst the Bishop article should contain information specific to the history and status of that particular office. I also feel that a decision needs to be made to standardise the Bishop articles. At present some have the list of incumbents within the page and some have a separate page for the list of incumbents. --JohnArmagh 07:04, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bishop of St Asaph. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050320015243/http://tejones.net:80/religion/Bishops/ to http://tejones.net/religion/Bishops
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC)