Talk:Bisexual politics
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
There is nothing in this article, as it currently is, that isn't already addressed by the Biphobia and Bisexual erasure articles. It should be merged with one or both of those articles, per WP:Content fork. Flyer22 (talk) 18:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- How do you suggest it be merged? – Jordan Hooper (talk) 17:57, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not in a hurry to merge the content. But as to how, I point to what I stated above; simply move the content to which of the two articles it fits best in. What the Bisexual politics article is mainly talking about is bisexual erasure. As I noted to you before on your talk page, it has been argued that the Biphobia and Bisexual erasure articles should be merged. And now, with the Bisexual politics article, we have another article addressing these topics. We don't need all three. If there were an LGBT politics article, we could merge the content there. But we don't need an LGBT politics article; those politics can be covered in the LGBT community article or the LGBT social movements article; they are already covered at both of those articles. Similarly, we don't need a Gay politics article or a Lesbian politics article; well, okay, it seems that the Political lesbianism article counts as a Lesbian politics article. Flyer22 (talk) 18:12, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Sentence clarity/grammar in Identity
[edit]The opening sentence under the Identity subheading of the Issues section is not clearly understandable with the current comma/conjunction placement, and I would like to change it into a listing format that is more easily read; ex. ...centers upon (item 1), (item 2), and (item 3). AziraphalesBookshop (talk) 00:34, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Grammar Edit
[edit]The word "lesbian" in the line "...that they had less to lose than lesbian or gay men..." under the "Criticism" heading should be changed to either "lesbians" or more accurately, the phrase "lesbian women". AnchorsAway10 (talk) 04:00, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bisexual politics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150301183013/http://www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/bisex_movements.html to http://www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/bisex_movements.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:12, 21 July 2017 (UTC)