Birth of a New Day was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Remove directors since they are not noted in the infoboxes for albums
The audio sample should be at the end of the section for the music instead, as it is okay for media to overlap into the below section
[1] should not be in the lead, as the sourcing is not required
Remove wikilink on studio album
"by English-American electronic music duo of" → "by English-American electronic duo 2814, consisting of" and remove the "both collaborating" part because things will have been switched around to name the duo first
"The duo stated that they wanted the record" → "2814 stated that they wanted it"
"with its themes being mainly a reflection of HKE's" → "with the themes mainly reflecting HKE's"
"also the first physical release of the label;" → "also the record label's first physical release;"
Add the release years of the albums in brackets; however, they are not sourced as being among the genre's most popular releases and neither is the album
Change the bit about it being positively received to a new sentence, reading: "The album received generally positive reviews from music critics," then adding what was praised
"While believing that his solo album" → "While believing the album"
"he states that it is" → "he stated that it is"
"although later pointing that this makes" → "although later pointed out how this makes"
"a bit more melancholic"." → "a bit more melancholy."" since that is what the source actually says
"he also notes how the themes of" → "he also noted how most of the themes of"
"3 months before the release" → "Three months before the release"
"should do is" → "should aim to do is make"
"He further points out that in" → "He further pointed out that with"
"to depict a feeling" → "to depict an image"
Introduction to what NeonVice is for is not needed
"HKE states that the album" → "HKE stated that the album"
"to 2814's debut album; he notes" → "to 2814; he noted"
"Telepath feel they" → "Telepath felt they"
"the album since finishing the mastering process in December 2014." → "Birth of a New Day since finishing it in December 2014." because the source does not specifically state what the finishing touches were
"HKE further points out" → "HKE further pointed out"
"the futuristic ambiance and atmosphere of their first album," → "the futuristic ambiance of its predecessor," with the target
Retitle to Musical style and composition, plus swap with recording and production in the section order
Target ambient to Ambient music on the first audio sample's text, but remove the Bandcamp public part per WP:SOURCE
"the 5th track of the album," → "the fifth track of the album," on the second audio sample's text, but the parts about its sound in comparison to the other songs is not backed up; either add the appropriate source(s) or reword to still talking about the sound but with no comparisons
Add release year of the album in brackets on the img and target looped to Loop (music)
Even though both genres are sourced, it is not mentioned that the album was one of the first vaporwave release to be considered as the other genre
Remove wikilink on ambient music in prose
"states that in this album, he and Telepath wanted the album to" → "stated that for the album, he and Telepath wanted to"
"create a futuristic dream and world" → "create a futuristic dream world"
"It is unclear whether..." remove the part of this sentence leading up to the first comma per WP:SYNTH
"since the duo often presents the album" → "The duo has presented Birth of a New Day"
"neon utopia", but" → "neon utopia," but" with the wikilink
"but HKE frequently states in interviews that his" → "but HKE stated his"
"have played a major role in the album's production;" → "played a major role in the production;"
"HKE stated in another interview that" → "he stated in an interview that"
"looped over for 5-9 minutes each," → "looped for 5-9 minutes each," with the target, but none of this sentence is backed up
Add release year of the album in brackets
"having 10-minute and 13-minute lengths respectively." → "having lengths of 10 and 13 minutes, respectively."
In cases like the above sentence, it is acceptable to not have sources that write out the info since it is backed up by the audio
"The album is notable for" → "Birth of a New Day is notable for"
"in the album's entire runtime.)" → "throughout the entirety of the album.)"
[16][14] should be put in numerical order and add [4] here before them because the album has not been sourced as vaporwave since the last para
"the 7th track of the album," → "the seventh track of the album," on the third audio sample's text
The first letter of Mandarin should be capitalised and target to Mandarin Chinese, plus source or remove the "Recovery" part
Remove tumblr and .gif parts, as tumblr is not reliable
"which was previously well-known in the social media for" → "who was previously well-known for" and remove the other vaporwave art part since it's not backed up
[4][18][10] put in numerical order
Wikilink cyberpunk, though none of that sentence is backed up by the source
"written in Japanese: three of those representing" → "written in Japanese; three of those represent" with the target
"and two of those representing" → "while two of them represent"
"the duo behind the album," → "the duo behind it,"
"HKE states that the number 2814" → "HKE stated that 2 8 1 4"
"to press the album on vinyl:" → "to press Birth of a New Day on vinyl;"
None of the number figures are backed up
"and it ended up" → "and the campaign ended up"
The 1000 copies part is not sourced and change to 1,000
"bonus track, titled Aftermath." → "bonus track, entitled "Aftermath"." with the wikilink per MOS:LINK2SECT, but it is not sourced that this is included on the cassette
The album being released by Not Not Fun Records is sourced, but not the year or number of copies
"being the first physical release of the label;" → "becoming the first physical release of the record label;" with the wikilink
"in an interview with NeonVice, HKE states that" → "HKE stated that" since the NeonVice interview has been introduced as having happened at one point and then the month is mentioned at another, so this is overkill
Remove target on cassette
"while Dream Catalogue worked" → "while his label worked"
"He further states that" → "He further stated that"
"closes her eyes and sleeps before the video" → "closing her eyes and sleeping before the scene"
"Published by radioclub.jp and directed by Anise Mariko," – this should just be "The video was published by radioclub.jp and directed by Anise Mariko." because the channel part is not backed up by a link to the video and the rest is violating WP:SOURCE
Img is not needed here since they should not be in reception across from the ratings box
"Upon release, Birth of a New Day was critically acclaimed by the vaporwave scene and received positive reaction from professional critics." → "Birth of a New Day was met with critical acclaim by the vaporwave scene and generally positive reviews from music critics." with the target
"The Rolling Stone magazine has reacted positively" → "Christopher R. Weingarten from Rolling Stone magazine reacted positively"
"has described the album as" → "described the album as"
"most important dreampunk releases" → "most important ambient releases"
"besides being named..." remove all of this since it is not backed up apart from the ambient part, which I have moved since the dreampunk part isn't sourced
"Rolling Stone noted that" → "Weingarten noted that"
Copyvio score looks too high at 50.0%; reduce quoting from ref 4 to fix this, though the other flagged URL is fine since that is only due to repetition of the album's title
Make sure all of these are archived by using the tool
I am going to have to ✗ Fail this article since it has been 10 days after the review and I've had no response, even after posting on the nominator's talk page. --K. Peake07:54, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You mention that the language of the album is Japanese, not Mandarin, but that is only the case for the song titles. There is spoken Chinese included on the album. 77.100.61.119 (talk) 22:07, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Wetrorave: The article states that the album resembles Basinki's Disintigration Loops, and goes so far as to include a picture of Basinski, but the source attributed to this [1] (the album's page on Bandcamp) does not make this claim. I checked archive.org to see if the website was different when you wrote the article, but it was not. Can you help me understand what I'm missing here? TarkusABtalk/contrib04:43, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Wiki Wikardo: Upon further research, I don't think we should use the ni~tsu romanization.
The only sources that provide that any romanization (including the track romanizations) are attributed to the 2015 re-release through Not Not Fun Records. They only did one re-release. All other releases before and after were through 2814's original label, Dream Catalogue.
Dream Catalogue has only ever called the album Birth of a New Day or 新しい日の誕生. [1][2]. They have never provided romanizations for the album or track names. You can view images of the front/back sleeves on discogs. [3]
ni~tsu is not a valid romanization of 日 in Japanese