Talk:Birmingham Bridge

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pittsburgh Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment

I hope somebody reads this*

I'm an engineering student at U of Pitt, and I'm doing a report on this bridge. I don't contribute to Wikipedia, but I'd be willing to give somebody a copy of my final paper in a few months, from which they could update this page. The paper wouldn't be re-distributable, but any information gleaned could be added to this page (with proper citation, of course). The focus of the paper would be the bridge design from an engineering standpoint, half focusing on the 'basics,' (stuff sophomore engineering students would use), and half focusing on the advanced engineering (stuff seniors like myself would use) along with a section on why the bridge failed in early 2008. I'll be getting public records and performing most of the calculations myself, along with photographing the bridge for visual inspection. So, should I bother Wikipedia with this, or is this the grounds of original research? Somebody please respond, I'm making this page my homepage. Arthur toafk 20:24, 1 October 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arthur toafk (talk • contribs)

Ramp design would prevent Fifth or Forbes from being made two-way?

The article formerly claimed

Ramps leading to the bridge were constructed in a manner which ensures that both Forbes Avenue and Fifth Avenue would be one-way streets permanently.

Besides being unsourced original research, this statement appears to be incorrect. Note that Fifth already has two-way traffic, via a bus-only lane, and buses already turn onto and exit the bridge from this eastbound lane. So no ramp change would be required to make Fifth a normal two-way street, just removing the bus-only signs.

Converting Forbes to two-way traffic would require some vehicles to make a sharp turn, but nothing outrageous. Perhaps 110 degrees instead of 90, for northbound traffic turning west onto a hypothetical two-way Forbes. --StevenDoerfler (talk) 19:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Birmingham Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.tribune-democrat.com/local/local_story_039102844.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080229171849/http://pghbridges.com:80/articles/PA3-13.htm to http://pghbridges.com/articles/PA3-13.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Birmingham Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130208211315/http://www.tribune-democrat.com/local/local_story_039102844.html to http://www.tribune-democrat.com/local/local_story_039102844.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://pghbridges.com/articles/PA3-13.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:25, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]