Talk:Birgeria
Appearance
The contents of the Birgeriidae page were merged into Birgeria on 3 January 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Birgeria article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merge proposal
[edit]Rather than merging Birgeriidae to Birgeria (which seems the wrong way around anyway), given that we have two levels of monotypy, I suggest merging both to the order Birgeriformes. Klbrain (talk) 20:49, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- We usually keep the genus level articles rather than the higher level ones when there are several levels of monotypy in prehistoric taxa. FunkMonk (talk) 21:06, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks; that makes sense. Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 15:02, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Fishes articles
- Low-importance Fishes articles
- WikiProject Fishes articles
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles
- Stub-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/April 2008
- Accepted AfC submissions