Talk:Birds of the World: Recommended English Names

A fact from Birds of the World: Recommended English Names appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 February 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Birds of the World: Recommended English Names is the result of a 16-year effort to get consensus on standard English names for the world's birds?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Birds of the World: Recommended English Names.

Wikipedia

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Birds Low‑importance

Birds of the World: Recommended English Names is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Page views

(to make this graph work, it may be necessary to Edit the section, make no changes, and click the "Show preview" button at the bottom of the editing page; simply exit the way you came)—Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) • contribs) 21:51, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Birds of the World: Recommended English Names. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

review

The line in section: Reception, "Reviews of the book were generally favorable.^{[3][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]}", looks a bit awkward for a couple of reasons: the first is that most of the references for the favourable reviews are to the book itself. I don't have access to the print version, and while it is conceivable the book includes pre-print reviews, their inclusion within the primary source needs to be clarified and preferably linked to original publication (if it was). If peer reviews state as much, then they should be the ones left in the inline citation.

Secondly, there is published criticism of the whole scheme's objectives, aside from their later attempts to omit hyphenation, and I think someone [else] should include that in the same section. — cygnis insignis 21:37, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]