Talk:Bir Bikram 2
Appearance
A fact from Bir Bikram 2 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 June 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 13:10, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that a comedian was arrested for reviewing 2019 Nepali romantic comedy Bir Bikram 2? Source: Comedian in police custody for a video reviewing the film Bir Bikram 2 "More than two weeks after filmmaker Milan Chams filed a police complaint about a video that Meme Nepal, a popular Facebook page, had posted about his recent film—Bir Bikram 2—Pranesh Gautam, the comedian who appears in the video, was detained on Friday"
- ALT1:... that a comedian was arrested for reviewing 2019 Nepali romantic comedy film?
- Reviewed: New International Economic Order
Created by CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk). Self-nominated at 15:03, 21 May 2020 (UTC).
- Article is long enough (~2,000 chars), new enough (created May 21/22), is neutral, and appears not to have any plagiarism. I am concerned that almost the entire Release and reception section is quotes though.
- There are no citations in the plot section, however, and it's only a single line. That section really ought to be expanded, and you can cite the reviews that talk about the plot to do so. Also, it's not clear what "he breaks the two best friends" means.
- Both hooks are interesting, neutral, cited, and short enough. I don't think that focusing on the arrest is going to be a problem. I prefer the original over ALT1.
- No image. QPQ is present (the review is a correct procedural summary rejection).
- Please ping me once the concerns with the plot section are resolved. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:55, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- @The Squirrel Conspiracy: I have expanded the plot. The sources don't talk about the plot a lot. Per WP:FILMPLOT:
Since films are primary sources in their articles, basic descriptions of their plots are acceptable without reference to an outside source.
~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 12:13, 23 May 2020 (UTC)- OK, this is good then. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:29, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- @The Squirrel Conspiracy: I have expanded the plot. The sources don't talk about the plot a lot. Per WP:FILMPLOT: