Talk:Bipolar II disorder/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GrahamColm (talk · contribs) 20:59, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have been following the recent work on the article, but despite the work done it is not ready for GA status yet. It still lacks citations, particularly those that satisfy WP:MEDRS. The section "Signs and symptoms" is still just a stub, and the bullet point list needs developing into fluid, well written prose. There are numerous WP:MoS non-compliances throughout the article. And where is the History and Epidemiology section? There is still plagiarized text visible in edit mode, and this is still a concern that has to be fully checked for the whole contribution. I am sorry but this nomination is a quick fail – there's so much work still needed. Graham Colm (talk) 20:59, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is also listy (lists should be converted to prose), needs correct paraphrased info in the Diagnosis section, and should comply with WP:MEDMOS and WP:MEDRS. It is not close to GA status, and needs a good deal of work still. Also, we don't put citations on a stand-alone line at the end of a list-- text should be prosified and cited inline, so the citation isn't left hanging. No idea what a "specifier" is, but see WP:MEDMOS for correct section headings for disorders. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:33, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]