Talk:Biphenyl

Chemicals Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupational Safety and Health

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

If anyone is watching

If anyone is watching this page, there is an error in the table: "Solubility = Insoluble"? I know for a fact that biphenyl is soluble in benzene, so maybe "Solubility in Water" was intended? I know neither what was originally intended by the field nor its solubility in various solvents, so I will not by editing it. Thermodude 13:37, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NFPA rating

Updated NFPA rating according to Sigma Aldrich MSDS (2-0-0)Xenofonos (talk) 17:48, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Carcinogen?

Since biphenyl is essentially two bonded benzene molecules, and since benzene is a known carcinogen, is biphenyl a known or suspected carcinogen?--Metalhead94 (talk) 14:22, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, not known or suspected to be a carcinogen by either the European Union or the IARC. There are plenty of compounds which contain benzene rings which are not carcinogenic (see phenylalanine, for example). Physchim62 (talk) 14:37, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Just a thought.--Metalhead94 (talk) 14:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SMILES discrepancy between here and the SMILES page

On this the biphenyl page the SMILES is shown as: c1ccc(cc1)c2ccccc2 while on the SMILES page it is shown as: c1ccccc1-c2ccccc2 (biphenyl is used as an example there). Which is correct? I think its the one on the SMILES page. (Extremo88 (talk) 14:37, 22 April 2012 (UTC))[reply]

OK forget it they are just two equivalent strings for the same compound. Extremo88 (talk) 14:49, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This 12 elapsed mins helps reestablish my faith in this place, and in humankind in general. Cheer, Le PRof Leprof 7272 (talk) 19:23, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reactants

I can't seem to find a reference that says benzene reacts with toluene to form biphenyl -- it should be 2 benzene molecules reacting to form biphenyl and H2, shouldn't it?^[who?]

It does not, and no. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 19:25, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References:

1. Maerker, J. B., & Weiss, A. H. (1965). Catalytic hydrodealkylation of alkyl substituted benzenoid hydrocarbons. United States Patent Office, US3178486, 1. Retrieved from http://www.google.com/patents/US3178486

2. Alibeyli, R., Yeniova, H., Bilgesü, a. Y., & Karaduman, A. (2002). KINETIC PECULIARITY OF CO-PRODUCTION OF BENZENE AND NAPHTHALENE FROM AROMATIC MIXTURES BY THERMAL HYDRODEALKYLATION. Petroleum Science and Technology, 20(1-2), 51. doi:10.1081/LFT-120002086

Still can't find a reference that says benzene reacts with toluene to form biphenyl (although the stoichiometry works as shown at the time of writing this comment). Can we update the wikipedia article to show the correct reaction? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.121.136.47 (talk) 00:15, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For that kind of info, the "bible" = Ullmann's (which is cited in Biphenyl!). Sayeth Ullmann's: "Biphenyl is currently obtained mainly as a byproduct in the production of benzene by thermal or catalytic hydrodealkylation of toluene. ... carried out ... at 700 ... with a hydrogen pressure ... Toluene conversion... from 35 to 85 %, with methane being formed at 2.5 mol% above the stoichiometric." --Smokefoot (talk) 01:36, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bravi grazie

…this is a perfect case where addition of the space filling model adds value otherwise not easily or thoroughly achieved. Thanks for effort, and thanks for not making it spin. In future, if such figures were accompanied, in a legend, by an explanation of methods and purpose of pose, like this Description [1], I for one would become by an ecstatic fit, likely never ceasing. (A sight worth the admission fee.) Cheers, onward and upward, and again, bravo, brava, grazie. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 19:21, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Links in stereochemistry section

I have updated the "optical stability" link to reflect the reorganization of the stereochemistry articles. It appears to me, though, that the link may no longer be relevant. I don't know enough chemistry to be sure. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 15:20, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Biphenyl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060304144243/http://www.npi.gov.au:80/database/substance-info/profiles/14.html to http://www.npi.gov.au/database/substance-info/profiles/14.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bisphenol?

I'm conflicted about this hatnote because while it has similar spelling hopefully the change in suffix from yl to ol is somewhat visible.

It is hard to disambiguate the two in a single line for a layperson. It's hard to draw much structural comparison because there are two changes, the hydroxyls and the methane or other joint in the middle. Biphenyl/diphenyl and bisphenol are as alike as a decagon and a dodecahedron - there's some similar parts but everything around them is different.

It may be worth comparing bisphenols to biphenyl methane (as suggested on the bisphenol page) but that doesn't quite explain the extra hydroxyl groups. It may be worth looking through diphenol or other pages with the di- prefix for other ideas. Techhead7890 (talk) 12:06, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]