Jump to content

Talk:Biopython

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was moved as non-controversial. Non-admin closure. Tevildo (talk) 18:41, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Tevildo (talk) 18:41, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BioPythonBiopython — Page title should be Biopython, not BioPython

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Original author(s)

[edit]

The page says that the original authors are Jeff Chang and Brad Chapman. The citation is to their ACM journal article "Biopython: Python tools for computation biology." A non-paywalled version of that article is at http://biopython.org/DIST/docs/acm/ACMbiopy.html . You'll see that while they are the authors of the paper, the paper says nothing about the original Biopython authors. Therefore, this citation does not support the claim being made.

The two originators of the project are Jeff Chang and Andrew Dalke. See http://www.dalkescientific.com/writings/PyCon2004.html for a statement to that effect by Andrew Dalke, and you can see history leading to that OiB'99 BoF session at http://bio.perl.org/pipermail/bioperl-l/1999-August/003255.html .

Now, "originator" is of course not the same as "author", and in any case I'm Andrew Dalke so this is a "Conflict of interest#Writing about yourself and people you know". Because the cited page is to a prestigious journal and my blog is not, I figured I would give more evidence here.

The first posts to the mailing list were in Sept. 1999 ( http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/biopython/1999-September/date.html ) , and Brad did not get involved with the project until Feb. 8, 2000 ( http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/biopython/2000-February/000158.html ). The first code was checked in to CVS on Feb. 8, 2000 by Jeff Chang (http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/biopython/2000-February/000163.html ) where he "added the code for the sequence class Andrew proposed a few months ago and have started work on parsers for Blast, Fasta, and SwissProt."

I think this establishes that Brad was not one of the "original author(s)" of Biopython and/or that the list of original authors should be expanded to include Andrew Dalke, if not also other people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.252.39.192 (talk) 23:01, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Biopython. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]