Talk:Biopesticide

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Biopesticide article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Agriculture Mid‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Possibly merge with "biological pesticide". Chitosan is fairly unproven and not a typical biopesticide - the page subtely appears to advertise commercial products. Roy Bateman (talk) 08:14, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For those interested Chitosan is a proven Biopesticide technology that has been tested for over twenty years by DuPont/ConAgra Venture (DCV) and AgriHouse. These patent biopesticide technologies elicit a natural defense response in plants. The term "faily unproven" and "not typical biopesiticide" is simply not correct by the above author. The EPA granted AgriHouse a Biopesticide Label in September 2008 and an amended label in 2009. --71.208.73.21 (talk) 17:00, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken about efficacy, but its status as a 'biological pesticide' - as with the plant extracts - is I suggest controversial. Why are you anonymous? Roy Bateman (talk) 03:00, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merged

I merged the text from Biological pesticide into this article, since it seems clear they are referring to the same thing. Biopesticide is the appropriate title as clearly indicated by these usage counts:

	Google web	Google books	Google scholar
Biopesticide	1,210,000	33,400	14,900
Biological pesticide	343,000	3,920	1,930

I also created a category: Category:Biopesticides. --Epipelagic (talk) 05:29, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ridiculous claim

"Every plant species has developed a built-in unique chemical complex structure that protects it from pests. "

Oh really ! 'Every' plant species ? What are all the cows eating, then ? This extravagant claim would appear to be a major overstatement.Eregli bob (talk) 09:03, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Does this need to be it's own article?

There is no way that this deserves to be it's own article. This should definitely be called biological pesticides. It's literally just a contraction..

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Biopesticide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120515143828/http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/134na5.pdf to http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/134na5.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Biopesticide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131216235945/http://www.ijcdi.com/FILEPath/82.pdf to http://www.ijcdi.com/FILEPath/82.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:06, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A new formulation in sciense - Pestiphages

Pestiphages (Latin: pestis «pest» + greek. φαγεῖν «to eat»)^[1] — introduced organisms, that destroy pest organisms in agroecosystems. Pestiphages are an important biological component of agrobiodiversity and have a substantial role in ecologization of agriculture. Pest organisms of agrocenosis and pestiphages are in detrimental type of biological interaction. The inhibitive influence of pestiphages have bioregulated the populations of pest organisms. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hovsep Grigoryan (talk • contribs) 15:38, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a WP:NEOLOGISM or biological control agents. Kingofaces43 (talk) 16:29, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Yericyan S.K., Grigoryan H.E. - «Fundamentals of organic farming», p. 66, 2019. Yerevan: Manual. ISBN 978‐9939‐78‐022‐1.(in Armenian)

Wiki Education assignment: Bio 401 Cell Biology with lab F2022

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2022 and 16 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): The Gentle Hamster (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Jparcoeur (talk) 19:04, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nano section removed

This section was added by one editor. The work looks un-notable because the refs are weak. === Nanotechnology === The [[Encapsulation (pharmacology)|encapsulation]] of some biological compounds in [[Nanoparticle|nanoparticulate]] systems has been shown to improve their effectiveness against [[PESTS|pests]], reduce their [[toxicity]] toward people and the environment, and lessen the losses caused by physical [[deterioration]] (such as volatilization and leaching).<ref>{{Cite journal |last=de Oliveira |first=Jhones Luiz |last2=Campos |first2=Estefânia Vangelie Ramos |last3=Bakshi |first3=Mansi |last4=Abhilash |first4=P.C. |last5=Fraceto |first5=Leonardo Fernandes |date=2014-12 |title=Application of nanotechnology for the encapsulation of botanical insecticides for sustainable agriculture: Prospects and promises |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.10.010 |journal=Biotechnology Advances |volume=32 |issue=8 |pages=1550–1561 |doi=10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.10.010 |issn=0734-9750}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Bakry |first=Amr M. |last2=Abbas |first2=Shabbar |last3=Ali |first3=Barkat |last4=Majeed |first4=Hamid |last5=Abouelwafa |first5=Mohamed Y. |last6=Mousa |first6=Ahmed |last7=Liang |first7=Li |date=2015-11-13 |title=Microencapsulation of Oils: A Comprehensive Review of Benefits, Techniques, and Applications |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12179 |journal=Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety |volume=15 |issue=1 |pages=143–182 |doi=10.1111/1541-4337.12179 |issn=1541-4337}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Giongo |first=Angelina Maria Marcomini |last2=Vendramim |first2=José Djair |last3=Forim |first3=Moacir Rossi |date=2016-02 |title=Evaluation of neem-based nanoformulations as alternative to control fall armyworm |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1413-70542016000100002 |journal=Ciência e Agrotecnologia |volume=40 |issue=1 |pages=26–36 |doi=10.1590/s1413-70542016000100002 |issn=1413-7054}}</ref> Thus, [[nanotechnology]] may aid in the creation of less toxic [[Bio-pesticides|biopesticides]] with acceptable safety profiles, greater active agent stability, improved efficacy against the intended pests, and higher end-user acceptance.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Bakry |first=Amr M. |last2=Abbas |first2=Shabbar |last3=Ali |first3=Barkat |last4=Majeed |first4=Hamid |last5=Abouelwafa |first5=Mohamed Y. |last6=Mousa |first6=Ahmed |last7=Liang |first7=Li |date=2015-11-13 |title=Microencapsulation of Oils: A Comprehensive Review of Benefits, Techniques, and Applications |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12179 |journal=Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety |volume=15 |issue=1 |pages=143–182 |doi=10.1111/1541-4337.12179 |issn=1541-4337}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |last=Bandeppa |title=Soil Ecological Pros and Cons of Nanomaterials: Impact on Microorganisms and Soil Health |date=2019 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9370-0_10 |work=Nanotechnology for Agriculture |pages=145–159 |place=Singapore |publisher=Springer Singapore |isbn=978-981-329-369-4 |access-date=2022-10-17 |last2=Gobinath |first2=R. |last3=Latha |first3=P. C. |last4=Manasa |first4=V. |last5=Chavan |first5=Satish}}</ref><ref>Prasad, R.; Kumar, V.; Prasad, K.S. Nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture: Present concerns and future aspects. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2014, 13, 705–713.</ref> [[Azadirachta indica|Neem]] ([[Azadirachta indica|''Azadirachta'' ''indica'']]) oil can be effectively protected from quick [[Degradation (geology)|degradation]] by the use of nanoparticles, providing a more [[sustained action]] on the intended pests. The [[Biodegradable polymer|biodegradable polymers]] utilised in this type of formulation enable continuous administration of the active ingredient with no damage to the environment. Because there is currently a lack of extensive understanding regarding [[risk assessment]] factors and the subsequent toxicity of nanoparticles towards components of [[Agroecosystem|agroecosystems]] after their release into the environment, [[Future researcher|future research]] must focus on ways to avoid the [[Risks associated with climate change|risks associated]] with the use of nanoparticles.<ref>Mishra, S.; Keswani, C.; Abhilash, P.C.; Fraceto, L.F.; Singh, H.B. Integrated approach of agri-nanotechnology: Challenges and future trends. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 471.</ref> --Smokefoot (talk) 21:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Yericyan S.K., Grigoryan H.E. - «Fundamentals of organic farming», p. 66, 2019. Yerevan: Manual. ISBN 978‐9939‐78‐022‐1.(in Armenian)

[1]