Talk:Biomedical waste

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sanitation Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sanitation, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sanitation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SanitationWikipedia:WikiProject SanitationTemplate:WikiProject Sanitationsanitation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled

The section about advice on how to protect oneself from biomedical waste does not seem to belong here. 88.163.168.188 (talk) 23:45, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are comments about a specific company's services which sound more like an advertisement. 88.163.168.188 (talk) 23:45, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the above comment. Further, some related information belongs in a chemical waste article, not this one. I will move it in time. MFERMION (talk) 19:47, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merger with Medical waste

In the absence of objections over the last year, I have completed this merger. LT90001 (talk) 07:08, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Biomedical waste. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927224344/http://www.netregs.gov.uk/netregs/legislation/287972/?lang=_e to http://www.netregs.gov.uk/netregs/legislation/287972/?lang=_e

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2019 and 8 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Iles27. Peer reviewers: Indybenipal, Kshea692, Mzkoya26.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:47, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review #2: Biomedical waste

The article is very detailed and informational which helps it flow easily. Everything in regards to context seems reliable and comes from a neutral perspective rather than a persuasive one. I found the regulation and management section (of countries around the world) and the section on how the environment is affected to be very fascinating. The sources are reliable and come from intelligent sources. I can't think of anything that should be added as it seems you have it all planned out (including the links to other pages). Well done! Indybenipal (talk) 15:48, 6 May 2019 (UTC)Indy Benipal[reply]

Expanding "The Effects of Medical Waste on the Environment" under "Environmental Effects"

I think it's important to add this information to "The Effects of Medical Waste on the Environment" section under the "Environmental Effects" heading because plastic pollution also impacts environmental health and a lot of plastic waste is produced from medical settings.

The high volume of plastic use in the medical field also poses a dangerous threat to the environment. According to North and Halden, 85% of disposable plastic materials make up all medical equipment.[19] Our current reliance on plastic materials is rooted in their unique capabilities to be lightweight, cost-effective, and durable while preserving the sterility of medical equipment. In addition to the serious health implications of releasing harmful toxins in the environment from medical waste deposits, introducing this volume of single-use plastics can catalyze the compounding health detriments caused by macro and microplastics. Stephx wiki (talk) 19:00, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Biohazard

Editors of this article may wish to participate in a discussion at Talk:Biological hazard#SARS-COV-2 and caption: BRD, possibly with a view to contributing a more relevant image? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 15:08, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]