Talk:Biocurator
Appearance
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]The "See also" section doesn't make much sense in the present state, linking towards two arbitrary databases.
Unless there is opposition, I will delete these two links, and add links to: Digital Curation, Bioinformatics, and Category:Biological databases. Marcrr (talk) 20:00, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- I agree. The AuthorReward part although somwhat relevant is given undue prominence in the current article. It would also make sense to add an external reference section with a link to the ISB. Alexbateman (talk) 11:29, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- I edited "See also". I didn't notice previously the long section on AuthorReward. It should probably be changed into a section on wikis and contributor rewards in general, but I don't have time for now.Marcrr (talk) 09:59, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Migrate content to Biocuration
[edit]Hello,
I'll migrate some of the content of this page to Biocuration, as they are more related to the field than to the profession itself. If someone disagrees, feel free to discuss/revert. Thanks, TiagoLubiana (talk) 13:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)