Talk:Biocosm

This article was nominated for deletion on 2006 June 22. The result of the discussion was Don't delete (see below).

AfD closure comment: this should either be reduced to a stub or merged with Anthropic principle. --Deathphoenix ʕ 16:57, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is just a touch outside the anthropic priciple -- it belongs more in sci-fi. Jim62sch 21:45, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Useless and Missleading Redirect

This concept is no longer defined in the article this redirect point to; it is briefly touched on, but can scarcely be said to be explained, in fact the term is never used. It is confusing and less than useless to maintain a page (that is linked to, both in Wikipedia, and without) that only serves to catch traffic and point it towards a page that does not explain the term at all. We should purge the few remaining links to this page and erase it, if we are not going to devote any effort towards explaining the term. If it is not notable, it's not notable-if it is worth of inclusion, it should be explained wherever we send readers, or left blank until such time as an article is written or the term is explained within another article.71.235.31.212 (talk) 07:50, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]