Talk:Bioamplifier

Physiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the physiology of the brain, nerves and nervous system.

Neuroscience Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biology Low‑importance

	Biology portal Bioamplifier is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Georgia Institute of Technology/Introduction to Neuroscience (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

Untitled

Assignment not submitted before 11:59:00 UTC Nov 18 grading most recent 11/20

Quality of the information: 2
Article size: 0
(14,626 bytes) Late and under 15000 bytes
Readability: 1
Some of the sentence structures are not as fluid
References: 1
Expert interview is not a published or broadcasted interview and is not a acceptable wikipedia source add more outside citations for the same information to strengthen article
Links: 2
Link Augustus Waller, Willem Einthoven, capillary electrometer
Responsive to Comments: 1
Did not link to bioamplification
Formatting: 1
Unsure if it's necessary to write extensively about ekg, emg, ect. when they have their own pages
Writing: 1
Change extensibly to extensively, "The Vacuum" vacuum should be lowercase "The electrodes delegates signals to the amplifier unit" should be delegate "skin, specifically, on scalp." should be "the scalp", "Multielectrode" to Multi-electrode
Used Real Name: 2
Is Outstanding in some way: 1
ok article but not outstanding

Total: (13/20 - penalty for being late)
Jsiemer3 (talk) 21:28, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Grading 11/24 1. Quality of Information: 2
Good information. Specifically liked the history section.
2. Article size:0
Did not submit anything before due date
3. Readability:2
4. Refs:2
has required number of references
5. Links: 2
Links seem okay
6. Responsive to comments:2
Not really applicable
7. Formatting: 2
Like bullet points
8. Writing: 1
You can expand upon electrocardiography, electromyography, electroencephalography after the bullet points. You can also 9. Used Real Name:2
10. Outstanding?:1
To be outstanding I would include a few pictures and tables to better represent content and reach general audience.
Total: (16/20 - penalty for being late)
Jim Schwoebel (talk) 21:49, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality of the information: 2
Article size: 0
Being very late
Readability: 2
Looks ok
References: 2
Using different resources such as books, and articles. Remember to put PMIDs if applicable as Dr. Potter mentioned in the email!
Links: 1
Augustus Waller, Willem Einthoven, capillary electrometer in history part should be linked. Also sweat glands, sympathetic nervous system, skin conductance should in Galvanic skin response part should be linked. Check again and see is there anything should be linked.
Responsive to Comments: 2
Formatting: 2
nice bullet points, succinct information.
Writing: 1
Some minor mistakes as Jsiemer3 mentioned.
Used Real Name: 2
Is Outstanding in some way: 0
Nice job for introducing this technology, but being late. Deduction for 2 points.

Total: (14/20 - penalty for being late)
Fu Hung Shiu (talk) 22:39, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Various Sources

Output media of a bioamplifier; ie: Various devices or electronic instruments. I could also see it being closly related to bioamplification.