Jump to content

Talk:BioShock: The Collection/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 00:09, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Shall leave comments soon. ♦ jaguar 00:09, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lead
  • "BioShock: The Collection is a collection of the BioShock video games" - would 'compilation' be more apt?
  • The second paragraph of the lead is on the short side and would benefit from summarising critics' views. I recall the game being criticised for its bugs upon release. Expand a little after "Critical reception of The Collection was generally positive..."
  • "The game was a bestselling title in the US and UK" - minor, but I would write United States and United Kingdom fully, but feel free to ignore
Contents
  • "...contains all three titles in the BioShock video game series" - seems redundant
  • The Contents section is missing basic information on series gameplay. I'm looking at Halo: The Master Chief Collection for reference here - I'd mention a very brief sentence or two about its gameplay mechanics, like: The games combine first-person shooter and role-playing elements...
Reception
  • The reception section is perhaps on the short side, but acceptable for GA.
  • "Game Revolution's Peter Paras and praised" - needless conjunction
  • NintendoLife's score is missing in the table. I also note that Game Revolution isn't italicised. I personally don't italicise websites, but NintendoLife is here
  • "More critically, Derek Taal said that the gameplay " - who's this? Who's he writing for?

This is overall a solid article. The sources are all of good standard. I've noted some minor concerns such as the lead not including a summary of critics' views and there are also some minor tweaks to be done to the reception. Otherwise this is comprehensive enough for GA, seeing as it's a compilation.  On holdjaguar 00:25, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jaguar: Hey, thanks for the review. I believe I've addressed all of the above points (pulled in a few sources to add a bit about the gameplay, since most of the reviews just gloss over it, consistently italicized the websites so they're uniform, cleaned up the minor text stuff.) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 21:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks David. With those minor issues out the way this meets the GA criteria, so let's get this promoted. jaguar 16:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]