Talk:Bio-Rad Laboratories/Archives/2018
Appearance
This is an archive of past discussions about Bio-Rad Laboratories. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please do not delete
Don't delete please! Bio-Rad is notable; being a research group, it must have developed something groundbreaking... just have to figure out what it is, hehe... --Geopgeop 22:35, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- yeah, i'd say it's fairly notable as they are one of the top producers of thermal cycling equipment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.84.255.153 (talk) 05:35, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, it was one of the winners of this award, along with Dell... --Geopgeop 22:36, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Here's the link: http://www.lifescienceindustryawards.com/winners.html [2006 Life Science Industry Awards]
- This article is neutral, and definitely not an AD --John hyams
- I beg to differ: "Bio-Rad's Life Science Research Group is best known for its pioneering work in electrophoresis for over 50 years. Other key areas of strength". This sounds as though it could have been taken directly from a brochure. Which is not to say that the article should be deleted as spam. But it definitely needs to be toned down and brought to a neutral point of view. modify 20:08, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- The whole article needs to be rewritten to sound less like ad copy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.205.92.164 (talk) 21:48, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- Please remove the image of Dave, Alice and Norman as the company (founder) doesn't want that displaying any longer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeblack214 (talk • contribs) 22:29, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
- The whole article needs to be rewritten to sound less like ad copy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.205.92.164 (talk) 21:48, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- I beg to differ: "Bio-Rad's Life Science Research Group is best known for its pioneering work in electrophoresis for over 50 years. Other key areas of strength". This sounds as though it could have been taken directly from a brochure. Which is not to say that the article should be deleted as spam. But it definitely needs to be toned down and brought to a neutral point of view. modify 20:08, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- This article is neutral, and definitely not an AD --John hyams