Talk:Binz squat

Switzerland Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Squatting Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Squatting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of squatting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SquattingWikipedia:WikiProject SquattingTemplate:WikiProject Squattingsquatting articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

autonomous social centre

@Czar i don't think autonomous social centre needs to be explicitly referenced, do you? for me it was already clear, since you reverted me i added the vice link which you appear to have ignored through pedantry. if you do want to impose rules for what is an autonomous social centre please discuss here. if you do feel the need for explicit reference in this case, this link will do i guess, i draw your attention to Kulturzentrum in the headline.Mujinga (talk) 10:34, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Within a few months, the abandoned industrial park had been transformed into an autonomous space that offered free housing to its 50 residents, ranging in age from newborns to 70-year-olds, and gave more than 100 people a space to do art and shit.

I agree that the article doesn't have to use the term "autonomous social centre" but it needs to at least show that such activities were happening there, which I didn't see in Neue Zürcher Zeitung. The above quote from Vice is sufficient, but the whole point of referencing on Wikipedia is for readers to follow the immediate link to verify the article's contents. Wikipedia becomes untrustworthy if its text is unverifiable. If you think that is pedantry, please consider one of the many encyclopedias with lesser contribution standards. czar 16:39, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

oh whatever floats your boat just please be consistent then it's easier for other editors to understand your actions Mujinga (talk) 11:24, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]