This article is within the scope of WikiProject Barack Obama, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Barack ObamaWikipedia:WikiProject Barack ObamaTemplate:WikiProject Barack ObamaBarack Obama articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s articles
Note to a more knowledgeable editor. The most recent (June 2013) AfD was closed. There should be a link to the proper discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Binders full of women (3rd nomination), to show a future editor trying to send this up for AfD again that there was a snowball discussion, again. The link didn't show in the format. I've made a couple of attempts to insert it, but have failed. Trackinfo (talk) 17:01, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is a non-notable silly article. We Americans sometimes act like fools around election time. Everyone else must be laughing at us. You do not see these kind of ads masquerading as an article by our non-American friends. Snap out of it. Would someone please put it up for deletion and put it out of its misery?
If you are hoping to delete this article, two things to be aware of:
1) As it says towards the top of this page "This page was nominated for deletion on 18 October 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus." (The "Merge" discussion, above, is from those who wanted it to be deleted, weren't happy it failed and seem to figure this is another means to the same end.
The idea is supposed to be introduced on the Talk page. I really do not give a damn about this article, just gave my comment. It is not worth my time arguing about. Look at its readability score. Mugginsx (talk) 13:59, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
keep The article is well-referenced, and seems to describe a pivotal moment in the 2012 debates. The 'Binders' issue seems relevant - not only to the election itself, but to the burgeoning confluence between the internet and politics. I disagree with any attempts to merge or delete this article, if not for it's political relevance, then for the rather revolutionary impact the internet community may have had on this election <> Alt lys er svunnet hen (talk) 23:54, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Binders full of women. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Yes, the phrase was used in an episode. This is a trivial use in popular culture. It does not tell us anything about the phrase.
We do not include it here for the same reason we do not list every movie, TV show, book, song, album, play, opera, newspaper article, magazine, speech, statue, comic strip, knock-knock joke, etc. that mentions Richard Nixon in Richard Nixon. Knowing that they were mentioned in an episode of Friends tells us nothing about Nixon, God, Sesame Street, spoons, recliners, etc.
If necessary, we can protect the article and see if some of those IP addresses aren't related to each other and/or any accounts. - SummerPhDv2.002:04, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
