A fact from Billy Waters (busker) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 August 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Billy Waters(pictured), known for his peculiar antics, appeared in Tom and Jerry?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is related to the Derby Museum and Art Gallery. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Derby Museum and Art GalleryWikipedia:GLAM/DerbyTemplate:WikiProject Derby Museum and Art GalleryDerby Museum and Art Gallery-related articles
Billy Waters (busker) is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Just an observation on an interesting article. Which leg was actually missing? the Derby porcelain model and the painted portrait show different legs! Richard Avery (talk) 06:54, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well spotted. I thought about using it as the DYK fact but I wasn't sure if it was true as photos can get reversed. I took the photo of the pottery myself and the writing proves that it is true. The photo of the painting is probably right but I don't know. If I had to choose then I'd assume the painting was correct as it looks as if it was drawn from life, whereas the potter looks like they may have been designed by someone who had never met a black man. Oh thanks for the compliment to the article. Victuallers (talk) 09:06, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ive added the Cruikshank version - do feel free to add more - it might be that the pot figure was a reminder of racism but that OR and speculative. Victuallers (talk) 15:40, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
