Talk:Billie Frank (Rude Awakening)
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 24 April 2019
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: No consensus to move — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:57, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Billie Frank (Rude Awakening) → Billie Frank – WP:TWODABS. Unreal7 (talk) 17:05, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:TWODABS. When there is WP:NOPRIMARY. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:19, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: No evidence of primary status (or even majority usage) was provided, and the nominator has been around long enough to know it should have been. —BarrelProof (talk) 02:27, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support. There is only one article titled "Billie Frank". Station1 (talk) 04:35, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- Station1 as you are reminded almost every time you say this :) this is completely and totally irrelevant for titling purposes on en.wp and contrary to multiple guidelines. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:58, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- Hardly every time; only those times when you happen to be commenting on the same RM. By now you know we disagree. That there is only one Billie Frank notable enough currently to have a standalone article on WP is highly relevant as to whether the title should be more WP:PRECISE and less WP:CONCISE than necessary. Station1 (talk) 21:38, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- Station1 as you are reminded almost every time you say this :) this is completely and totally irrelevant for titling purposes on en.wp and contrary to multiple guidelines. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:58, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support There is only one notable topic with this title. Users searching for alternate spellings (people who do not go by this name) can easily find the correct target using a hatnote.--Yaksar (let's chat) 18:16, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per In ictu oculi and per comment by BarrelProof. This fictional character is not the primary topic of the Billie Frank disambiguation page. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 22:17, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.