Talk:Bill Roe (cricketer)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Kaiser matias (talk · contribs) 18:16, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
Only a couple comments:
- "He achieved notability in 1881, when he made the highest score in cricket at the time." and "Roe gained cricketing fame in the summer of 1881..." seem to refer to the same thing. As the latter goes into more detail and explains Roe's notability, you can drop the first instance, as it doesn't need to be repeated, especially in the lead.
- Cut this out of the first paragraph, and tweaked it in the second for clarity, how's that? Harrias talk 21:36, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- The latter half of the first paragraph in the "highest score in cricket" section has no citations, which considering it makes some important claims is necessary.
- Just finding this – thanks for your patience! Harrias talk 21:36, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Other than those minor issues seems like it should be good. Kaiser matias (talk) 18:16, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Looks good to me now. Kaiser matias (talk) 01:51, 16 April 2017 (UTC)