Jump to content

Talk:Bill Pullman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Picture

[edit]

Maybe we should get a picture of this guy since everyone knows the name but not what he looks like. In fact he's so forgettable that Family Guy had a joke with him regarding the confusion of him with Bill Paxton. I am among those many people who isn't sure which one is which. In fact I even remember once a radio show even said something to the effect of "This movie has Bill Paxton or Bill Pullman, not sure which one. Just one of those Bill P's that seems to be in a tonne of movies and nobody is sure who he is." Abrynkus 00:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The reason Bill Pullman is so forgettable is because, unlike most Hollywood celebrities, Pullman doesn't do anything outside his filming, for the tabloid press to take any interest in him. He's like Sally Field. He just does his roles & then goes home to his family & doesn't court the press.--Splashen (talk) 03:11, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Official" website

[edit]

The link at the bottom that says "Official Website" leads to a page that says "Bill Pullman.org is not officially connected in any way with Bill Pullman." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.110.127.49 (talk) 20:25, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed it. Thanks much.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:56, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bill Pullman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bill Pullman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

pullman/paxton debate

[edit]

look, the fact you guys redacted this shiz don't mean shiz. FFS, if you have to go on multiple late-night talk shows to disambiguate yoursself, i am pretty sure it counts. Electricmaster (talk) 07:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've never understood the Pullman/Paxton debate. Besides having similar names, they don't look very similar and they certainly don't act similar. Besides, Bill Pullman looks more like Alec Baldwin or Michael Douglas. 2603:6080:5D00:2562:885B:988F:57A0:8E40 (talk) 16:58, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]