Talk:Bill John Baker

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Oklahoma Low‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"1/32 Cherokee"

I think an opinion page with this phrase "This information was unsolicited. I want the Cherokee people to have the opportunity to know how little Cherokee Mr. Baker really is. In my opinion John Baker needs to make his Certificate Degree of Indian Blood card information public." is not a reliable source, even if the information is true. Does anyone mind if I remove it or can someone replace it with a less biased source? Sorry for not signing in, thanks y'all! 207.144.25.210 (talk) 18:24, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Cherokee Phoenix webpage in question is here: [1]. Certainly, the letter to the editor that occupies most of the page is not a reliable source. Underneath that, however, is an editor's note that confirms Baker is 1/32 Cherokee (and goes on to note that this was also the case for Chief W. W. Keeler, and that "The Cherokee Nation does not have a blood quantum for citizenship or for holding office." I am inclined to think that the editor of the Cherokee Phoenix is a reliable source for this purpose—and perhaps the most authoritative one, although other sources are also available: it's been mentioned in a variety of other sources, some in connection with reportage about Elizabeth Warren. [2][3] --Arxiloxos (talk) 20:08, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I feel like you're trying to start an argument with me, I didn't say it wasn't true, and I know a good bit about how the Cherokee nation enrollment works (lineal descendant), I think the source is very biased, even if factually accurate, your attitude with me makes it seem like you wrote it. 207.144.25.210 (talk) 18:58, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, the cited source is not the letter to the editor (which, as already stated above, is not a reliable source) but the editor's note at the bottom of the page, which (as far as I can see) is entirely neutral, more detailed about the issue than other sources, and of undisputed factual accuracy is undisputed. So in my opinion this seems like the best source to use. Other editors may have different opinions. I had nothing to do with the letter to the editor or the editor's response: in the future, please try to avoid personal attacks on other editors. --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:10, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bill John Baker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160306032008/http://www.indianz.com/News/2015/017866.asp to http://www.indianz.com/News/2015/017866.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:21, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Bill John Baker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:13, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]