Jump to content

Talk:Bill Crews (minister)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Accepteable references

[edit]

While I understand Wikipedia doesn't like to use personal websites as a source, I'm struggling to find a profile of him online that doesn't just lift those facts straight from his website. For example, [1] or [2]. A Sydney Morning Herald article contains some facts [3] as does a brief profile of him as a nominee for Australian of the Year [4]. He is clearly notable enough being listed on Australian Living Treasures but what's listed on his website appears to be the basic facts about him. Crico 03:55, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clergyman

[edit]

Would Rev. Crews not be best described as Bill Crews (Australian clergyman)? Reverend is an honorific but not a job description. Also, I question the use of the capital initial in 'Reverend', if it is meant as a job description. Eg, 'plumber' or 'scholar' would not be initialized.Alpheus (talk) 23:13, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a problem with the proposed change. Crico (talk) 03:19, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bill Crews (minister). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:27, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]