Talk:Bill Bradfield AM
Appearance
The contents of the Bill Bradfield AM page were merged into William A. Bradfield on 22 August 2014 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Proposal to merge William A. Bradfield with Bill Bradfield AM
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was to Merge Kyle(talk) 05:53, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Yes, I support this merge. I wrote the article "Bill Bradfield AM" yesterday because it was red-linked from the "Bradfield" dsambiguation page, which did not link to the "William A. Bradfield" page. In retrospect, I should have done a more thorough search: mea culpa. I have never been involved in a merge; what is the process, who approves it, and who does it? I am willing to do it, to fix my own mess, but don't know how... --Gronk Oz (talk) 01:08, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Merge, the merge is not controversial, so you can read up on the process at Wikipedia:Merging. I will close the comment period and let you do the heavy lifting. Its a simple process - and you get to make a new redirect page. -Kyle(talk) 03:48, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This article was nominated for merging with William A. Bradfield on August 2014. The result of the discussion was Approved. |